{"id":116,"date":"2015-07-23T00:36:47","date_gmt":"2015-07-23T00:36:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=116"},"modified":"2015-07-23T00:36:47","modified_gmt":"2015-07-23T00:36:47","slug":"oig-report-raises-serious-medicare-part-d-fraud-waste-and-abuse-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=116","title":{"rendered":"OIG Report Raises Serious Medicare Part D Fraud, Waste And Abuse Concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(By &#8211;\u00a0Jenna C. Bigornia and Melissa A. Wong,\u00a0<b>Holland &amp; Knight)<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Last month, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a comprehensive report and data brief detailing its concerns about the ability of Medicare Part D sponsors \u2013 as well as the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) and its Medicare Drug Integrity Contractor (MEDIC) \u2013 to detect and prevent fraud, waste and abuse in Medicare Part D.1 The OIG identified two key areas for improvement, specifically: (1) the need to more effectively collect and analyze program data to identify and resolve potential fraud, waste and abuse before it occurs; and (2) the need for more robust oversight to ensure proper utilization and payment within the Part D program. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hklaw.com\/publications\/OIG-Report-Raises-Serious-Medicare-Part-D-Fraud-Waste-and-Abuse-Concerns-07-22-2015\/?utm_source=Mondaq&amp;utm_medium=syndication&amp;utm_campaign=View-Original\" target=\"_blank\">Read more&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h6><strong>Notice<\/strong>: The \u201c<strong>Read more<\/strong>\u2026\u201d link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org.<\/h6>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(By &#8211;\u00a0Jenna C. Bigornia and Melissa A. Wong,\u00a0Holland &amp; Knight) Last month, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=116"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":117,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116\/revisions\/117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}