{"id":14478,"date":"2019-11-11T08:40:02","date_gmt":"2019-11-11T13:40:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=14478"},"modified":"2019-11-11T08:40:02","modified_gmt":"2019-11-11T13:40:02","slug":"missouri-appeals-court-upholds-changes-to-medicaid-dsh-payment-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=14478","title":{"rendered":"Missouri appeals court upholds changes to Medicaid DSH payment rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(By Kelly Gooch for Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review)<\/p>\n<p>A federal appeals court in Missouri on Nov. 4 held that a rule issued by CMS requiring Medicaid payments to Disproportionate Share Hospitals to be reduced based on payments hospitals receive from private payers and Medicare is valid.\u00a0 Continue reading article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beckershospitalreview.com\/finance\/missouri-appeals-court-upholds-changes-to-medicaid-dsh-payment-rules.html\">here&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-7787\" src=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court.jpg 700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<pre><strong>Notice:<\/strong> The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; medicarereport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org.<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(By Kelly Gooch for Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review) A federal appeals court in Missouri on Nov. 4 held that a rule<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,21,19,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cms","category-health-care-finance","category-legal-actionscourt-decisions","category-medicaid"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14479,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14478\/revisions\/14479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}