{"id":18396,"date":"2021-06-28T09:57:35","date_gmt":"2021-06-28T13:57:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=18396"},"modified":"2021-06-28T09:57:35","modified_gmt":"2021-06-28T13:57:35","slug":"judge-rules-aetna-violates-erisa-via-recoupment-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=18396","title":{"rendered":"Judge rules Aetna violates ERISA via recoupment practice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(By Nick Moran for <em>Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>A New Jersey district judge ruled June 21 that Aetna&#8217;s recoupment of payments made to Lutz Surgical Partners were in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.\u00a0 Continue reading the article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beckershospitalreview.com\/payer-issues\/judge-rules-aetna-violates-erisa-via-recoupment-practice.html\">here&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-7787\" src=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court.jpg 700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<pre><strong>Notice:<\/strong> The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; medicarereport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(By Nick Moran for Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review) A New Jersey district judge ruled June 21 that Aetna&#8217;s recoupment of payments<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-actionscourt-decisions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=18396"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18397,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18396\/revisions\/18397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=18396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=18396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=18396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}