{"id":19007,"date":"2021-10-25T08:17:53","date_gmt":"2021-10-25T12:17:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=19007"},"modified":"2021-10-25T08:17:53","modified_gmt":"2021-10-25T12:17:53","slug":"court-halts-new-york-city-retiree-medicare-contract","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=19007","title":{"rendered":"Court halts New York City retiree Medicare contract"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(By Nick Moran for <em>Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p>After receiving pushback from retirees, New York City&#8217;s new Medicare contract for city retirees will be paused indefinitely, a state Supreme Court judge ruled Oct. 21. Continue reading the article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beckershospitalreview.com\/payer-issues\/court-halts-new-york-city-retiree-medicare-contract.html\">here&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-7787\" src=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/court.jpg 700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<pre>Notice: The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; medicarereport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(By Nick Moran for Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review) After receiving pushback from retirees, New York City&#8217;s new Medicare contract for city<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42,19,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-employer-healthcare","category-legal-actionscourt-decisions","category-medicare-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19007"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19008,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19007\/revisions\/19008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}