{"id":25981,"date":"2026-05-18T08:26:03","date_gmt":"2026-05-18T12:26:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=25981"},"modified":"2026-05-18T08:26:04","modified_gmt":"2026-05-18T12:26:04","slug":"medicaid-changes-in-house-and-senate-reconciliation-bills-would-increase-costs-for-1-3-million-low-income-medicare-beneficiaries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=25981","title":{"rendered":"Medicaid Changes in House and Senate Reconciliation Bills Would Increase Costs for 1.3 Million Low-Income Medicare Beneficiaries"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>(Authors: Maiss Mohamed, Alice Burns, and Jeannie Fuglesten Biniek for The Kaiser Family Foundation Published: May 14, 2026)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On May 22, the House passed a reconciliation bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would partially pay to extend expiring tax cuts by cutting Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion over ten years and 10.3 million fewer people would be enrolled in Medicaid in 2034, including 1.3 million people with Medicare, otherwise known as \u201cdual-eligible individuals\u201d. The loss of Medicaid coverage for Medicare beneficiaries stems from delaying implementation of two rules that aimed to streamline the enrollment process and make it easier for people to maintain Medicaid coverage by reducing administrative barriers. Dual-eligible individuals would be disproportionately impacted by these provisions, comprising nearly 60% of the 2.3 million Medicaid enrollees who are estimated to lose coverage as a result of delaying these rules under the House reconciliation bill (Figure 1). Instead of placing a moratorium on implementation of the rules, the recently released Senate reconciliation language would prohibit nearly all of the provisions in the rules from ever being implemented.  Continue reading <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kff.org\/medicaid\/medicaid-changes-in-house-reconciliation-bill-would-increase-costs-for-1-3-million-low-income-medicare-beneficiaries\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.kff.org\/medicaid\/medicaid-changes-in-house-reconciliation-bill-would-increase-costs-for-1-3-million-low-income-medicare-beneficiaries\/\">here&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"147\" height=\"138\" class=\"wp-image-7499\" style=\"width: 147px;\" src=\"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Kaiser-Family-Foundation.jpg\" alt=\"\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><strong>Notice:<\/strong>\u00a0The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; medicarereport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Authors: Maiss Mohamed, Alice Burns, and Jeannie Fuglesten Biniek for The Kaiser Family Foundation Published: May 14, 2026) On May<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1521,21,10,16,6],"tags":[431,1451,67,61,1782],"class_list":["post-25981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dual-eligible","category-health-care-finance","category-legislative-update","category-medicaid","category-medicare-general","tag-dual-eligible","tag-legistlation","tag-medicaid","tag-medicare","tag-one-big-beautiful-bill-act"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25981"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25981\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25982,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25981\/revisions\/25982"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}