{"id":26280,"date":"2026-07-17T07:46:27","date_gmt":"2026-07-17T11:46:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=26280"},"modified":"2026-07-17T07:46:27","modified_gmt":"2026-07-17T11:46:27","slug":"unitedhealthcare-no-surprises-arbitration-system-needs-to-be-reformed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=26280","title":{"rendered":"UnitedHealthcare: No Surprises arbitration system \u2018needs to be reformed\u2019\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>(By: Jakob Emerson for <em>Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UnitedHealthcare is joining the choir of insurers calling for an overhaul of the No Surprises Act\u2019s arbitration system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe IDR process is not working, certainly not as Congress intended it, and it needs to be reformed,\u201d Dan Kueter, CEO of the insurer\u2019s employer and individual business, said on UnitedHealth Group\u2019s second-quarter earnings call July 16.  Continue reading <a href=\"https:\/\/www.beckerspayer.com\/payer\/unitedhealthcare-no-surprises-arbitration-system-needs-to-be-reformed\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.beckerspayer.com\/payer\/unitedhealthcare-no-surprises-arbitration-system-needs-to-be-reformed\/\">here&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><strong>Notice:<\/strong>\u00a0The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; medicarereport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(By: Jakob Emerson for Becker&#8217;s Hospital Review) UnitedHealthcare is joining the choir of insurers calling for an overhaul of the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":7924,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,200,19,10],"tags":[1948,422,385,238,311],"class_list":["post-26280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-health-care-finance","category-health-insurance","category-legal-actionscourt-decisions","category-legislative-update","tag-arbitration","tag-health-insurers","tag-healthcare-costs","tag-healthcare-finance","tag-no-surprises-act"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26280"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26281,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26280\/revisions\/26281"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}