{"id":383,"date":"2015-08-09T12:01:11","date_gmt":"2015-08-09T16:01:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=383"},"modified":"2015-08-09T12:01:11","modified_gmt":"2015-08-09T16:01:11","slug":"youngs-bill-that-protects-medicare-patients-signed-into-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=383","title":{"rendered":"Young&#8217;s Bill That Protects Medicare Patients Signed Into Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(Source &#8211;\u00a0toddyoung.house.gov)<\/p>\n<p>Congressman Todd Young (R-IN) issued the following statement afterthe Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility (NOTICE) Act was signed by President Obama into law:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cElderly patients shouldn\u2019t have to worry about technical status codes and hospital billing procedures while they\u2019re focused on recovering,\u201d <strong>said Congressman Young.<\/strong>\u00a0 \u201cYet when those technical details can significantly impact their health coverage and future medical bills, they deserve to be made aware. This new law ensures seniors won\u2019t be caught off guard by a large medical bill because they weren\u2019t given proper notice of their status in the hospital.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/toddyoung.house.gov\/press-releases\/youngs-bill-that-protects-medicare-patients-signed-into-law\/\">Read more&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Notice<\/strong>: The \u201c<strong>Read more<\/strong>\u2026\u201d link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Source &#8211;\u00a0toddyoung.house.gov) Congressman Todd Young (R-IN) issued the following statement afterthe Notice of Observation Treatment and Implication for Care Eligibility<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legislative-update","category-medicare-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=383"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":384,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383\/revisions\/384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}