{"id":417,"date":"2015-08-11T00:34:49","date_gmt":"2015-08-11T04:34:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=417"},"modified":"2015-08-10T15:36:27","modified_gmt":"2015-08-10T19:36:27","slug":"despite-public-sentiment-house-gop-moving-ahead-with-medicare-premium-support","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/?p=417","title":{"rendered":"Despite Public Sentiment, House GOP Moving Ahead With Medicare \u201cPremium Support\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(By &#8211;\u00a0Mary K. Caffrey,\u00a0www.ajmc.com)<\/p>\n<p>House Republicans are making plans for an ambitious Medicare overhaul after the 2016 elections, the National Journal reported today, which would include the long-discussed change to \u201cpremium support,\u201d which Democrats deride as a voucher plan. US Representative Kevin Brady, the Texas Republican who chairs the House Ways and Means Health subcommittee, said the tough work of drafting language for changes to Medicare would get under way now in time for introduction in early 2017, when Republicans hope they will no longer be dealing with divided government. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ajmc.com\/focus-of-the-week\/0815\/despite-public-sentiment-house-gop-moving-ahead-with-medicare-premium-support\" target=\"_blank\">Read more&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Notice<\/strong>: The \u201c<strong>Read more<\/strong>\u2026\u201d link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link\u2019s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or medicarereport.org.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(By &#8211;\u00a0Mary K. Caffrey,\u00a0www.ajmc.com) House Republicans are making plans for an ambitious Medicare overhaul after the 2016 elections, the National<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legislative-update","category-medicare-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=417"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":418,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417\/revisions\/418"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medicarereport.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}